<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CineSnob &#187; 2010 Oscar nominations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinesnob.net/archives/tag/2010-oscar-nominations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinesnob.net</link>
	<description>Inferior Cinema Beware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Nomination Reactions</title>
		<link>http://www.cinesnob.net/archives/oscar-nomination-reactions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cinesnob.net/archives/oscar-nomination-reactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kiko Martinez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CineBlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Academy Award nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Oscar nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Award nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinesnob.net/?p=3437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like I do every February, I was up early this morning to hear the announcement of the nominees for this year's Academy Awards. I'm a big dork when it comes to these things and love keeping track of all the best movies of the year and try to predict who will be nominated. The more important predictions will come later this month when I make my picks on who will actual win the coveted Oscar, but until then check out below to see how I fared this year and what I thought about the nominations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I do every February, I was up early this morning to hear the announcement of the nominees for this year&#8217;s Academy Awards. I&#8217;m a big dork when it comes to these things and love keeping track of all the best movies of the year and try to predict who will be nominated. The more important predictions will come later this month when I make my picks on who will actual win the coveted Oscar, but until then check out below to see how I fared this year and what I thought about the nominations.</p>
<p><strong>BEST PICTURE</strong><br />
THE HURT LOCKER<br />
AVATAR<br />
INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS<br />
UP IN THE AIR<br />
PRECIOUS: BASED ON THE NOVEL PUSH BY SAPPHIRE<br />
AN EDUCATION<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">INVICTUS</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">THE BLIND SIDE<br />
</span>A SERIOUS MAN<br />
UP<br />
DISTRICT 9</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 9 for 10<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: Let’s ignore the fact (not really since I’m bringing it up) that my favorite film of 2009 (WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE) was shut out of every single category making its Oscar nomination total equal to zero (TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN has one). Anyway, back to my predictions. I think I did pretty well picking 9 of the 10. I guess the Academy thought they had enough apartheid representation with DISTRICT 9 and left INVICTUS out. I’m unpleasantly surprised to see THE BLIND SIDE get the nomination since I still think it’s one of the most overrated movies of the year. This isn&#8217;t the People Choice Awards, you know! That pick is exactly why I didn’t like the idea of a 10-nominee Best Picture race this year. The public was able to dictate this nomination. I could name at least 60 better movies that came out this year that should be in THE BLIND SIDE’s spot. As of right now, this is still a three-picture race between THE HURT LOCKER, AVATAR, and INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS.</p>
<p><strong>BEST DIRECTOR</strong><br />
KATHRYN BIGELOW, The Hurt Locker<br />
JAMES CAMERON, Avatar<br />
JASON REITMAN, Up in the Air<br />
QUENTIN TARANTINO, Inglourious Basterds<br />
LEE DANIELS, Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 5 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: No surprises here. I was a little worried for LEE DANIELS but he managed to get in although I don’t necessarily think his direction is what made PRECIOUS so powerful. As of right now, this is still a two-director race between KATHRYN BIGELOW and JAMES CAMERON.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ACTOR</strong><br />
JEFF BRIDGES, Crazy Heart<br />
GEORGE CLOONEY, Up in the Air<br />
COLIN FIRTH, A Single Man<br />
MORGAN FREEMAN, Invictus<br />
JEREMY RENNER, The Hurt Locker</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 5 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: No real surprises here although JEREMY RENNER was on the cusp and could have (should have?) been replaced by VIGGO MORTENSEN for The Road. Either way, this is a strong group of contenders. They are all very deserving of the nomination.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ACTRESS</strong><br />
MERYL STREEP, Julie &amp; Juila<br />
SANDRA BULLOCK, The Blind Side<br />
CAREY MULLIGAN, An Education<br />
GABBY SIDIBE, Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">EMILY BLUNT, The Young Victoria</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">HELEN MIRREN, The Last Station</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 4 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: No real surprises here although HELEN MIRREN was on the cusp and could have been replaced by EMILY BLUNT in The Young Victoria. I am still dumbfounded to see SANDRA BULLOCK on the list. It’s a two-actress race right now between her and MERYL STREEP although I think CAREY MULLIGAN gives the best performance of everyone.</p>
<p><strong>BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR</strong><br />
CHRISTOPH WALTZ, Inglourious Basterds<br />
CHRISTOPHER PLUMMER, The Last Station<br />
STANLEY TUCCI, The Lovely Bones<br />
WOODY HARRELSON, The Messenger<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">ALFRED MOLINA, An Education</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">MATT DAMON, Invictus</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 4 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: Really? MATT DAMON over ALFRED MOLINA or PETER SARSGAARD in AN EDUCATION? Sigh. No real surprises here other than it could have either gone DAMON or MOLINA. I still liked STANLEY TUCCI better in Julie &amp; Julia than I did in The Lovely Bones. WOODY HARRELSON is very deserving of this nomination.</p>
<p><strong>BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS</strong><br />
MO’NIQUE, Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire<br />
ANNA KENDRICK, Up in the Air<br />
VERA FARMIGA, Up in the Air<br />
PENELOPE CRUZ, Nine<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">MARION COTILLARD, Nine</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">MAGGIE GYLLENHAAL, Crazy Heart</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 4 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: The MAGGIE GYLLENHAAL pick was probably the biggest surprise when they announced the nominees on Feb. 2 probably because everyone was only focused on Jeff Bridges’ performance in the movie. I like GYLLENHAAL in Crazy Heart although I actually would have liked to see SAMANTHA MORTON get the nod for The Messenger. Most people thought JULIANNE MOORE would get the fifth spot for A Single Man. A lot of people were counting out PENELOPE CRUZ, but I’m glad I stuck by her.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY</strong><br />
THE HURT LOCKER<br />
INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS<br />
A SERIOUS MAN<br />
UP<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">(500) DAYS OF SUMMER</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">THE MESSENGER</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 4 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: It’s hard to be angry that (500) DAYS OF SUMMER was overlooked only because THE MESSENGER was such a well-written piece of work, too. All these nominees are deserving.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY</strong><br />
UP IN THE AIR<br />
AN EDUCATION<br />
PRECIOUS: BASED ON THE NOVEL PUSH BY SAPPHIRE<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">INVICTUS</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">IN THE LOOP</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">DISTRICT 9</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 3 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: IN THE LOOP was very sharp, witty and well-written although many people didn&#8217;t see it. DISTRICT 9 was also a very unique movie especially in the sci-fi genre. Other than WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE, I would have liked to have seen FANTASTIC MR. FOX grab a nomination here instead of IN THE LOOP or DISTRICT 9. Still, they&#8217;re all solid picks.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ANIMATED FEATURE</strong><br />
UP<br />
FANTASTIC MR. FOX<br />
THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG<br />
CORALINE<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF MEATBALLS</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">THE SECRET OF KELLS</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 4 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: THE SECRET OF KELLS was a surprise pick only because not too many people have heard of this movie. It’s the only one of the five nominees that didn’t have a wide release in theaters. I haven’t seen it either, so I can’t say too much about it until I do. Other than that, all the other nominees were basically locks. I would have liked to see MARY &amp; MAX miraculously find a spot in that group especially since not too many people saw that either and it looks like the Academy was open to considering smaller animated films.</p>
<p><strong>BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE</strong><br />
THE WHITE RIBBON<br />
A PROPHET<br />
AJAMI<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">WINTER IN WARTIME</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">EL SECRETO DE SUS OJOS</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">SAMSON AND DELILAH</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">THE MILK OF SORROW</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 3 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: From the short list, I’ve only seen THE WHITE RIBBON, A PROPHET, and SAMSON AND DELILAH. The rest were basically just guesses since most of these films have not hit the market yet. Either way, this award is going to THE WHITE RIBBON (one of my Top 10 films of 2009). A PROPHET is also very deserving. I can see why the Academy overlooked SAMSON AND DELILAH.</p>
<p><strong>DOCUMENTARY FEATURE</strong><br />
THE COVE<br />
FOOD, INC.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">THE BEACHES OFAGNES</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">BURMA VJ</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">UNDER OUR SKIN</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">THE MOST DANGEROUS MAN IN AMERICA<br />
</span><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">MUGABE AND THE WHITE AFRICAN</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">WHICH WAY HOME</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 2 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: From the short list, I’ve only seen THE COVE and FOOD, INC. Everything else was just a guess based on buzz so I can’t comment on the quality. I would have actually liked to have seen Chris Rock get a nod for GOOD HAIR. I thought that was a really hilarious and educational documentary. Michael Moore haters should be glad to see he didn&#8217;t get a nomination for CAPITALISM: A LOVE STORY.</p>
<p><strong>ART DIRECTION</strong><br />
NINE<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">AVATAR</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">A SINGLE MAN</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">IMAGINARIUM OF DOCTOR PARNASSUS</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">BRIGHT STAR</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">THE YOUNG VICTORIA</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">SHERLOCK HOLMES</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 1 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: Eww. I really stunk it up in this category. Someone really needs to go back and study the finer points of Art Direction.</p>
<p><strong>CINEMATOGRAPHY</strong><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">NINE</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">THE WHITE RIBBON<br />
</span>THE HURT LOCKER<br />
INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS<br />
AVATAR</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 3 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: Why I didn’t pick THE WHITE RIBBON as a nominee is beyond me. I guess I&#8217;m still experiencing WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE denial. HARRY POTTER is quite a surprise since none of the other HARRY POTTER movies got Cinematography nods before.</p>
<p><strong>COSTUME DESIGN</strong><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">THE IMAGINARIUM OF DOCTOR PARNASSUS</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">PUBLIC ENEMIES</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">COCO BEFORE CHANEL</span><br />
BRIGHT STAR<br />
NINE<br />
THE YOUNG VICTORIA</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 3 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: COCO BEFORE CHANEL is very deserving. DOCTOR PARNASSUS? Not quite sure where that nomination came from. I would have rather seen PUBLIC ENEMIES, INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS, or SHERLOCK HOLMES get that nomination.</p>
<p><strong>EDITING</strong><br />
THE HURT LOCKER<br />
INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS<br />
AVATAR<br />
DISTRICT 9<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">UP IN THE AIR</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">PRECIOUS: BASED ON THE NOVEL PUSH BY SAPPHIRE</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 4 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: Hmm. Can’t say I agree with the UP IN THE AIR blow off.</p>
<p><strong>MAKE UP</strong><br />
STAR TREK<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">DISTRICT 9</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">THE YOUNG VICTORIA</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">THE IMAGINARIUM OF DOCTOR PARNASSUS</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">IL DIVO</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 1 for 3<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: Where did IL DIVO come from? The two guys that did the make up for IL DIVO (an Italian movie I have never seen) were nominated last for doing a great job with make up on APOCALYPTO. But, still, that was a random nomination. I guess I have to seek out the movie to see if it was worthy or not.</p>
<p><strong>VISUAL EFFECTS</strong><br />
AVATAR<br />
STAR TREK<br />
DISTRICT 9</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 3 for 3<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: No surprises. AVATAR’s basically a sure thing anway.</p>
<p><strong>ORIGINAL SCORE<br />
</strong>AVATAR<br />
UP<br />
SHERLOCK HOLMES<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">A SINGLE MAN</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">THE HURT LOCKER<br />
</span><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">THE INFORMANT!</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">FANTASTIC MR. FOX</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 3 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: You’re not going to hear any complaining from me about the FANTASTIC MR. FOX nomination. Totally deserving! THE HURT LOCKER pick is kind of odd.</p>
<p><strong>ORIGINAL SONG</strong><br />
“WEARY KIND,” Crazy Heart<br />
“Down in New Orleans,” The Princess and the Frog<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">“CINEMA ITALIANO,” Nine</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">“TAKE IT ALL,” Nine</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">“I Will See You,” Avatar</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">“ALMOST THERE,” The Princess and the Frog</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">“(I Want to) Come Home,” Everybody’s Fine</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">“LOIN DE PANAME,” Paris 36</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 2 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: Ooo, la la. PARIS 36 is a big surprise. No one saw that one coming. I picked the wrong song for the right movie with NINE. Two songs for THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG, really? Doesn’t matter much since this is CRAZY HEART’s to win by a landslide. I hope if the producers of the Oscars decide to have all the nominated songs performed on stage we will see Jeff Bridges sing it himself although watching T-Bone Burnett do it might be cool as well.</p>
<p><strong>SOUND EDITING</strong><br />
AVATAR<br />
UP<br />
STAR TREK<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">DISTRICT 9</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS</span><br />
THE HURT LOCKER</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 4 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: Nice picks. No complaints.</p>
<p><strong>SOUND MIXING</strong><br />
AVATAR<br />
THE HURT LOCKER<br />
STAR TREK<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">DISTRICT 9</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">NINE</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 3 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: Giving TRANSFORMERS an Oscar nomination in stupidity would have been better, but I guess clanking metal does sound good when mixed well.</p>
<p><strong>ANIMATED SHORT</strong><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">PARTLY CLOUDY</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">LOGORAMA<br />
</span><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">THE CAT PIANO</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">GRANNY O’GRIMM’S SLEEPING BEAUTY</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">THE KINEMATOGRAPHY</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">FRENCH ROAST</span><br />
WALLACE AND GROMIT: A MATTER OF LOAF AND DEATH<br />
THE LADY AND THE REAPER</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 2 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: Wow, Pixar’s PARTLY CLOUDY was left off the list?? What happened there? That’s a big surprise. From the short list, I’ve only seen PARTLY CLOUDY, THE CAT PIANO (which I loved), and FRENCH ROAST (which was just okay in my opinion). The rest were just guesses. Still can’t get over that PARTLY CLOUDY snub.</p>
<p><strong>DOCUMENTARY SHORT</strong><br />
THE LAST TRUCK: CLOSING OF A GM PLANT<br />
MUSIC BY PRUDENCE<br />
CHINA’S UNNATURAL DISASTER: THE TEARS OF SICHUAN PROVINCE<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">WOMEN REBELS</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">THE LAST CAMPAIGN OF GOVENOR BOOTH GARDNER</span><br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">TELL THEM ANYTHING YOU WANT: A PORTRAIT OF MAURICE SENDAK</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">RABBIT A LA BERLIN</span></p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 3 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: Wow, WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE can’t even get any love in the Documentary Short category. I haven’t seen any of these movies, so all these predictions were basically far-fetched guesses based on buzz.</p>
<p><strong>LIVE-ACTION SHORT</strong><br />
MIRACLE FISH<br />
THE DOOR<br />
KAVI<br />
INSTEAD OF ABRACADABRA<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">HOTEL</span> <span style="color: #ff0000;">THE NEW TENANTS</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 4 for 5<br />
<strong>PERSONAL TAKE</strong>: Pretty good judging from the fact that I guessed on all of these based on buzz and which short films I thought had the most interesting synopsis.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>OVERALL RESULTS</strong>: 83 for 121 (69%)<br />
</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cinesnob.net/archives/oscar-nomination-reactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

